Publication

The Digital Privacy Paradox and Choice Architecture: Evidence from an Experiment in Fintech

By Susan Athey (Stanford), Christian Catalini (MIT Sloan), Alex Moehring, Catherine Tucker (MIT Sloan) · 2026 (first version February 2017)

Published: MIS Quarterly, 2026

Abstract

A field experiment built into the rollout of a digital wallet to thousands of MIT students — the MIT digital currency experiment — sheds light on consumer behavior regarding commercial, public and government surveillance. Whereas consumers say they care about privacy, they are willing to relinquish private data quite easily in exchange for convenience, small incentives, or reassuring but irrelevant information. Small costs introduced during the selection of digital wallets by the random ordering of featured options have a tangible effect on the technology ultimately adopted, often in sharp contrast with individuals’ stated preferences about privacy. Key safeguards such as “notice and choice” are unlikely to be effective, as providing more information about privacy trade-offs does not reduce the tendency of consumers to go against their own stated privacy preferences.

Figure from the paper: small incentives sharply reduce the share of students protecting their friends' privacy
Figure from the paper: small incentives sharply reduce the share of students protecting their friends' privacy

Links